Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Frazer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

A PPBAL from the District Court, Parish of St Mary, Voorhies, J. OPINION AND DECREE OE THE DISTRICT COURT. The defendant, Haney Frazer, is sued by the plaintiffs for the recovery of advances which they have made to her for the purchase of building materials, and for provisions and supplies for the use of her plantation.

Read the full summary

A PPBAL from the District Court, Parish of St Mary, Voorhies, J. OPINION AND DECREE OE THE DISTRICT COURT. The defendant, Haney Frazer, is sued by the plaintiffs for the recovery of advances which they have made to her for the purchase of building materials, and for provisions and supplies for the use of her plantation. The evidence satisfactorily establishes all the items of the amount sued upon, ■except $10 charged as commission for the endorsement of Hollander's note, $1 54 for postage, and $2000 charged as cash advanced. This charge is evidenced by the receipt of M. A. Frazer, the…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court*

—(Slidell, J., dissenting.) Judgment affirmed for the reasons given by the District Court.

This Judgment seems to have been delivered in 1850—by what Judge it doe? not appear. Present: Eüstis, C. J.; Rost, Slidell & Preston, Associate Justices. The judgment on the re-hearing was pronounced in 1852,

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dickinson Motors Co. v. SullivanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Haas v. HayesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Broussard v. RosenblumLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API