Legal Opinion · Dissent

Broussard v. Rosenblum

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 1926No. 10,062Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

CLAIBORNE, J.

The case of Jung vs. N. O. Ry. and Fox River Co., 145 La. 727, 82 South. 870, has no application to this case. The court thus states the issue to be decided in that case on p. 730:

“The issue here, therefore, must turn upon the question of whether or not, as a matter of fact, Arceneaux was the agent of the Fox River Butter Company and at the time engaged in attending to its business.”

The plaintiff in that case was knocked down by an automobile driven by Arceneaux. Under the belief that Arceneaux was in the employ of the Fox River Company, the plaintiff sued…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  3. Succession of GilmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  5. Rubenstein v. FilesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API