Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Fagelson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1928No. 18379PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. While it is the general rule that where a contract is made with several jointly, all should sue for the breach, this is not necessary when a good reason is shown to the contrary. Phillips v. Poole, 96 Ga. 515, 518 (23 S. E. 504). In the instant case the allegations of the petition to the effect that the defendant, Bernstein, had made a settlement with plaintiff's co-obligee, Katz, of any interest Katz may have had under the contract sued upon, and had taken a transfer from Katz of all of his stock in the corporation holding the subject-matter of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paulk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Stimpson Computing Scale Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Byck v. Weiler Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Jones v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Phillips v. PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minmar Builders, Inc. v. Beltway Excavators, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Thompson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Burger Chef Systems, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Gibbs v. WhelanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Greenbriar Shopping CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API