Legal Opinion
Vogel v. Glickman
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided August 14, 2000No. 5:97-cv-00212PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BIERY, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Second Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively Partial Summary Judgment, of Defendant, United States of America, Acting by and Through Daniel A. Gliekman, Secretary of United States Department of Agriculture, and Brief in Support (docket no. 88), plaintiffs response (docket no. 93), defendant’s reply (docket no. 94) and plaintiffs response (docket no. 95). After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted.
PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Faires v. CockerellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Williams v. Time Warner Operation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. v. Cal Western Reconveyance Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Vogel v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Whitcomb v. Lane (In re Whitcomb)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. v. Cal Western Reconveyance Corporation and Real Time Resolutions, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010