Legal Opinion
Krueger v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1972No. State 113PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
We are satisfied that the defendant did not have the right to a change of judge upon the filing of the affidavit of prejudice following the remand to the trial court. Section 956.03 (1), Stats. 1967, provides for the circumstances under which there may be a change of judge. The statute provides in part, “In felony cases the motion shall be made within 20 days after his arraignment and before the case is called for trial.” It is clear that the motion was not timely, and a change of judge at this juncture was not a matter of right.
Defendant also argues that there should be a change of judge in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fikes v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Barrera v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Turner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Mikulovsky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Bergenthal v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Briggs v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.