Legal Opinion

People v. Thompson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1955No. Crim. 3076PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The defendants, Clarence L. Thompson, Norman Smith and Clarence Williams were jointly charged with and found guilty by a jury of (1) kidnapping for the purpose of committing robbery (Pen. Code, § 209), (2) robbery, (3) burglary, connected together in their commission; the defendant Thompson was charged with, and admitted, three prior felony convictions, defendant Smith two, and defendant Williams one. Their motions for new trial were denied and they were sentenced to San Quentin—the three sentences of each of them to run concurrent with each other but consecutive to any prior incomplete…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. BurwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. DupreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API