Legal Opinion

Collins v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided April 15, 1918No. 14209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Claim for damages “ for the permanent appropriation of the waters of Wood creek, ’ ’ in the town of Vienna, Oneida county.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

At all the times herein mentioned the claimant was the owner of a farm of fifty-five and thirteen one-hundredths acres of land in the town of Vienna, Oneida county, the southerly boundary thereof being the center line of a stream of water known as Wood creek. This farm, prior to the acts of the state, was utilized as a dairy farm, a portion of it being used for pasture, and practically all the remainder of it being devoted to the raising of hay. About forty-five acres of the farm were overflowed each year prior to 1910 by the rising of the waters of Wood creek. It is asserted by the claimant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colrick v. . SwinburneNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Knox v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Van Buren v. Fishkill & M. W. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hackensack Water Company v. Village of NyackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Noakes v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1918
  3. Williams v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1919
  4. Hartzell v. Village of HamburgNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. American Woolen Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API