Legal Opinion
Hartzell v. Village of Hamburg
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles B. Wheeler,
Official Referee. The various plaintiffs above named are owners of properties on the so-called Eighteen Mile creek, which flows through the incorporated village of Hamburg in Erie county and into Lake Erie. The distance from the village to Lake Erie is about four miles.
The village of Hamburg has grown in population from 2,741 in 1915 to 4,731 in 1930.
Prior to the building of the present water system it was supplied in the main by water from wells outside the village limits. The time arrived when a larger supply was needed. Accordingly the village caused plans to be made for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Prentice v. . GeigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Matter of Van Etten v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gregory v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Hackensack Water Company v. Village of NyackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Village of NyackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970