Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Smith-Courtney Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1918PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, upon a petition against the members of the Convict Lime. Board, the Auditor of Public Accounts and the Treasurer. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants assign error.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

The Smith-Courtney Company, hereinafter called the plaintiff, claiming a balance due for the construction of a lime grinding plant at Staunton, under a contract with the Convict Lime Board (composed of the Governor, the Superintendent of the Penitentiary and the Commissioner of Agriculture), filed its petition in the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond against the members of the board, the Auditor of Public Accounts and the Treasurer, hereinafter called the defendants, under section 746 of the Code, and the court empaneled a jury, under section 748, which found a verdict for the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maia's Adm'r v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  2. Shenandoah Lime Co. v. GovernorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  3. Phillips v. Rector & Visitors of the University of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. A. C. Allen & SonsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  5. Barbour v. Melendy & RussellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mann v. County Board of Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. Marler v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Wiecking v. Allied Medical Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  5. Nelson County v. LovingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API