Boren v. Bullen
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
William Boren sued Michael Bullen for medical malpractice. The trial court granted Dr. Bullen’s motion for summary judgment and Mr. Boren appeals by one point of error. We affirm.
Mr. Boren challenges the trial court’s determination that the summary judgment evidence presented no genuine issue of material fact. He complains Dr. Bullen’s testimony in his own behalf was insufficient to prove his actions comported with the appropriate standard of care and that Dr. Bullen’s testimony was controverted by Dr. Robert Kilian, Mr. Boren’s expert. In reply, Dr. Bullen contends his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Carr v. BrasherTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Branton v. Wood, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Meru v. Huerta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Brandt v. Surber, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Frost National Bank v. L & F Distributors, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- San Patricio County v. Nueces County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.