Legal Opinion
McConico v. CORLEY, MONCUS AND BYNUM
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 7, 1990No. 89-922PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
567 So.2d 863 (1990)
James McCONICO, Jr.
v.
CORLEY, MONCUS AND BYNUM, P.C., and Frank Bynum.
89-922.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
September 7, 1990.
James McConico, Jr., pro se.
W. Lewis Garrison, Birmingham, for appellees.
SHORES, Justice.
The plaintiff, James McConico, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment for the defendants, Corley, Moncus and Bynum, P.C. (hereinafter referred to as Corley, Moncus), and Frank K. Bynum. We affirm.
The pleadings of this case, viewed most favorably to McConico, tend to show the following: McConico contracted to purchase a piece of property from Richard Reese and Charles…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Southern States Ford, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Smith v. J.H. Berry Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Pittman v. GattisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Marija Wolff, Individually And/or as of the Estate of C. Robert Wolff v. Allstate Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Johnson v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Anglin v. Household Retail Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
- Johnson v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.