Legal Opinion

State v. Unterseher

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1980No. Crim. 686PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Timothy Unterseher was found guilty of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of §§ 19-03.1-07(4)(a) and 19-03.1-23(l)(b), NDCC, by a jury, and on this appeal claims the trial court erred in refusing to give two. requested instructions relating to the defense of entrapment. We find no error. The conviction is affirmed.

Unterseher requested that the jury be instructed that:

“Entrapment can occur in either of two distinct ways:

The first occurs when the law enforcement officer uses persuasion to induce the commission of an offense.

The second occurs when a law enforcement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PfisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BartkowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kohler v. StephensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Barnes County Education Ass'n v. Barnes County Special Education BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. MeesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sheets v. Graco, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Balliet v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API