Legal Opinion

Shipman v. Fontaine Truck Equipment Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1990No. Docket 113012, 113675PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a products liability action involving consolidated appeals as of right. After a jury returned a verdict awarding plaintiffs $500,000 in damages, the trial court granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of defendant and third-party plaintiff Fontaine Truck Equipment Company. Plaintiffs appeal as of right from this order. In a separate appeal, Fontaine appeals as of right from an order granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of third-party defendant Uckele Animal Health Distributing, Inc. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

i

Plaintiff Roger Shipman was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fredericks v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Villar v. E W Bliss Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  2. Haberkorn v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Laura Hollister, American Community Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. Dayton Hudson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Portelli v. I R Construction Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. SHATTUCK OWEN v. Snowbird Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API