Legal Opinion

Met-Al, Inc. v. Hansen Storage Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 22, 1993No. 93-C-479, Adv. No. 92-2304PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WARREN, Senior District Judge.

Before the Court is the defendants’ motion for mandatory withdrawal of reference and their demand for a jury trial.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, Met-Al, Inc. (“Met-Al”), is a Wisconsin corporation which sells aluminum ingots produced from scrap aluminum. For approximately one year, beginning in October, 1991, Met-Al contracted to sell millions of dollars worth of aluminum ingots with people purporting to be representatives of the Emerson Electric Company and General Electric. In reality, the aluminum was received by Metal Brokers…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Schoenthal v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. In Re White Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vista Metals Corp. v. Metal Brokers International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  2. Official Plan Committee v. Starshak & Associates, Inc. (In Re Balsam Corp.)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API