United States v. Casteneda
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant Jose Casteneda stands convicted, based on his guilty plea, to one substantive and one conspiratorial count of heroin trafficking. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 812, 841, 846. He now appeals from that part of his judgment of conviction sentencing him to 135 months’ incarceration. Casteneda asserts that this incarceratory term is unreasonable because the district court (1) miscalculated his Sentencing Guidelines range and, (2) unreasonably failed to depart from his Criminal History category.
*17Co-defendant Jose Rolando Contreras stands convicted, based on his guilty plea, to two…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Daniel Lee FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- (HC)Patterson v. BurtonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020