Legal Opinion

The Southwark

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1904No. 16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. On motion for entry of decree.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

Unless the present case can be distinguished from The Wanata, 95 U. S. 600, 24 L. Ed. 461, I think the libelants are entitled to a decree against the claimants for the damages agreed upon, and for interest and costs, even although the amount of such decree exceeds the sum named in the stipulation. The decree against the surety, however — the City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Company — is to be limited to the principal sum for which it agreed to be bound. An effort is made to distinguish the cases, first, on the ground that The Wanata was an action for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The" Wanata"Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. The SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Haskins v. KellyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. Societe Purfina MaritimeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  2. Zimmerman v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. The King BleddynDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API