Legal Opinion
Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd. v. Societe Purfina Maritime
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1942No. 10179PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree based upon a libel filed November 18, 1940, and amended March 25, 1941, by Societe Purfina Maritime, a Belgian corporation, hereafter called Purfina, against Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd., a Japanese corporation, hereafter called Mitsubishi, and against the diesel oil cargo owned by General Petroleum Corporation of California, hereafter called General Petroleum, and loaded for Mitsubishi’s account on October 2, 1940, on the Belgian tanker Laurent Meeus at San Pedro, California, for unpaid freight claimed to be earned under a charter dated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- The Steamer WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Allanwilde Transport Corp. v. Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schirmer Stevedoring Co., Ltd. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corp., Brady Hamilton Stevedore Co., Williams, Dimond & Co., N. J. Goulandris, Ltd., Financiera Peruana, S.A. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corporation, N. J. Goulandris, Ltd. v. Marine Chartering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Schirmer Stevedoring Co. v. Seaboard Stevedoring Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- In Re Pacific Far East Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- United States v. Waterman Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Dear Publication & Radio, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.