Flersheim v. Cary
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Einn District Court. Replevin, by B. 8. Flersheim & Co. against A. R. Cary. Trial by jury, at the September term, 1886, and verdict and judgment for the defendant for costs. Plaintiffs bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Clogston, C.:
Plaintiffs .brought this action to recover certain billiard and pool tables and fixtures, claiming the right of possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed by one I. Croxton to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that defendant purchased said property from Croxton with a full knowledge of said mortgage, and subject thereto, and as a part payment thereof agreed to pay plaintiffs the amount then due on the mortgage debt, being $450 and interest. A copy of the chattel mortgage was attached to the plaintiffs’ petition, which showed that said mortgage also included…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Korman v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edwards County v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Fairbanks-Morse Co. v. City of GearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Light v. ConoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Board of County Commissioners v. State ex rel. Attorney-generalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Thacker v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918