Legal Opinion

Tylka v. Gerber Products Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 28, 1998No. 96 C 1647PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Approval of Form of Notice and Notice Plan in their class action against Defendant Gerber Products Company (“Gerber”). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.

I. Background

The facts and further procedural background of this ease are recited in the court’s opinion and order of March 3, 1998. See Tylka v. Gerber Products Co., 178 F.R.D. 493 (N.D.Ill.1998). A brief summary follows.

On March 22, 1996, Plaintiffs (all citizens of Illinois) filed a complaint against Gerber. An amended complaint…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Mace v. Van Ru Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. People Ex Rel. Daley v. Datacom Systems Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lyon v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Garner v. HealyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
  4. Bunting v. Progressive Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. MAN Roland Inc. v. Quantum Color Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API