Legal Opinion
In re Stull
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 27, 2013No. 12-11696PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING CONFIRMATION OF CHAPTER 13 PLAN
ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge.
Chapter 13 allows debtors to propose plans that discriminate between holders of unsecured claims so long as the discrimination is not “unfair.”1 This means that for appropriate reasons, debtors may propose to pay one unsecured claim on more favorable terms than another. The Code expressly forbids the payment of interest on an unsecured nondis-chargeable claim unless all of the other allowed claims are paid in full.2 Quincy Stull proposes to treat his nondischargeable student loan more favorably than his other unsecured…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bentley v. Boyajian (In Re Bentley)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2001
- In Re SharpUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- In Re MasonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- In Re WebbUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- In Re AbaunzaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re EngenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- In re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2013
- In re KnowlesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- In re PreciseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re SalazarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.