Legal Opinion

Hume v. Small Claims Court of Murray City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1979No. 15634Published

1Opinion of the Court

590 P.2d 309 (1979)

Rose Marie HUME, Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF MURRAY CITY, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 15634.

Supreme Court of Utah.

January 10, 1979.

Lucy Billings, Salt Lake City, for petitioner and appellant.

H. Craig Hall, Murray, for defendant and respondent.

WILKINS, Justice:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the District Court for Salt Lake County denying petitioner a writ of mandamus and involves procedural issues arising from an attempt to appeal from a judgment entered by a small claims court to the District Court under the provisions of Section 78-6-10.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Herman T. DOVE, Appellant, v. CODESCO, Formerly Known as Washington Dental Supply Company, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  2. Quillie B. Woodham v. The American Cystoscope Company of Pelham, N. Y., and the Xyz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Crooks v. Fourth Judicial District Court of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Dealeaner Hammond v. Public Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API