Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. New England Power Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 30, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

It appears from the allegations of the bill, which are admitted by the demurrer, that the defendant, a riparian proprietor, built in 1912 a dam across the Deerfield River at Shelburne Falls, an unnavigable stream, for the purpose of raising a head of water to operate its mill. The river is a mountain stream which at times rises rapidly, and before its waters were dammed, with the exception of one or two years when some water and ice came upon the lands of some of the plaintiffs who are riparian owners above the dam without causing damage, no overflow of water or accumulation of ice had…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Norris v. DoniphanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1863
  3. Cook v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  4. Thurston v. HancockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  5. Holden v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Simon v. Town of NeedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Smith v. New England Aircraft Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Paddock v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Commissioner of Public Health v. Bessie M. Burke Memorial HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API