Legal Opinion
Kuck v. Danaher
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 23, 2010No. Docket 08-5368-cvPublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant M. Peter Kuck appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Bryant, J.) dismissing his complaint. Kuck’s claims arise from his efforts to renew his permit to carry a firearm with the Connecticut Department of Public Safety (“DPS”). His principal claim is a procedural due process challenge alleging that DPS — in tandem with the Board of Firearms Permit Examiners (“the Board”) — has a practice of improperly denying permits, unnecessarily prolonging the appeals that follow, and then quietly…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Brod v. Omya, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Cox v. Warwick Valley Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Kachalsky v. County of WestchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Hightower v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Kuck v. DanaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.