Legal Opinion

United States v. Kevin Roberson

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 14, 1999No. 97-7309PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

The question presented for our review is whether applying AEDPA’s gatekeeping provisions to a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed after AEDPA’s effective date would have an impermissible retroactive result if the movant filed his first § 2255 motion prior to AEDPA’s enactment. We conclude that the application of AEDPA’s ga-tekeeping provisions to Kevin Roberson’s second § 2255 motion would have no impermissible retroactive result, and thus we hold that amended §§ 2244(b)(3)(A) and 2255 require us to deny Roberson’s request for authorization to proceed with…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. United States v. Johnny GunterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Quentin Miller, A/K/A "Q" Quentin MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Robert Benchoff v. Raymond ColleranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Luis Humberto BarbosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Donald JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API