Carr v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from St. Francis Circuit Court; Hance N. Hutton, Judge; i. The court erred in permitting the prosecuting attorney to challenge two jurors peremptorily after they had been accepted as jurors.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Francis Circuit Court; Hance N. Hutton, Judge; i. The court erred in permitting the prosecuting attorney to challenge two jurors peremptorily after they had been accepted as jurors. Kirby’s Digest, § § 2356-7, 2347. '2. It was error to permit the prosecuting attorney to ask defendant if he had not been criminally intimate with a certain woman, and if he had not threatened to kill any man in the community that went to see her or had anything to do with her. 3. It was also error to refuse the 3rd and 4th instructions asked for by defendant. 1. There was no error in permitting…
1Opinion of the CourtBatteE, J.
Alfred Carr was indicted for murder in the first degree committed by killing Bill Civil, and was tried and convicted of that offense; and he appealed to this court.
Appellant says that the trial court erred in permitting the State to peremptorily challenge two jurors after they had been examined and accepted as jurors in the case. But this was not error. It was lawful to do so. Allen v. State, 70 Ark. 337.
He next complains of the court for admitting the testimony of a witness named Jim Wallace, in which he testified that appellant, at the time he was arrested, said that he expected to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lackey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dewein v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- State v. ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. GaffneyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. HollisterWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Hannah v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.