Legal Opinion

Hill v. Withers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1960No. 35047PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a tort action after the trial court had sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’ amended complaint on the ground that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations.

The action was initiated by plaintiffs for personal injuries and damages allegedly sustained in an accident between a motor car owned by the Northern Pacific Railroad, operated by George W. Hill, Jr., and an automobile operated by Ida Mae Withers.

This being a negligence action, the three-year statute of limitations applies. RCW 4.16.080.

The facts, so far as we deem them to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Sandgren v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Segaline v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. DeSantis v. Angelo Merlino & Sons, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Culpepper v. Snohomish County Department of PlanningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Orear v. International Paint Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API