Legal Opinion

Joslyn v. Taplin & Rowell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 28, 1904Published

Trover. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the September Term., 1903, Orleans County, Stafford, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.

Read the full summary

Trover. Plea, the general issue. Trial by court at the September Term., 1903, Orleans County, Stafford, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The trial court found that the defendant at the time of trial was, and for ten years before had been, a deputy sheriff within and for the County of Orleans; that on April 4, 1903, an execution, issued om a judgment of the Orleans County Court in favor of C. K. Colby, W. S'. May, and William Collison and against O. H. Hawkins, was placed in his hands, as such deputy sheriff, for service on said O. H. Hawkins; that, after…

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

The land contract contained a provision whereby the vendor reserved the ownership and control of all crops, produce, and products thereafter raised or grown on the premises until the notes described therein should be fully paid. Within the meaning of that provision, the notes were never paid. Consequently the vendee never became the owner *425of the hay in question nor of any attachable interest therein. Under this reservation the vendor was the sole owner of the hay until he sold it to the defendants after the decree in the foreclosure proceedings respecting the land had become absolute. By…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whiting v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1894
  2. Sanborn v. KittredgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  3. Thomas v. WarnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
  4. Batchelder v. JennessSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
  5. Dickerman v. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API