Sanborn v. Kittredge
Supreme Court of Vermont
In Chancery. Appeal from the court of chancery. The facts in the opinion of the court-. are fully stated
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.
The orator claims in his bill, that he acquired a title to an undivided half of four hundred mill logs, chiefly pine, one large mill chain, and a shingle machine and gearing, in Victory in Essex county and in Bradleyvale in this county, by virtue of an attachment of the property, made on the 24th of April, 1837, followed by a sale thereof oil execution on the 14th and 22d of July, 1837, as the property of William S. Goodell, a debtor of the orator. The bill alleges, that Goodell was, at the time of the attachment and sale, the lawful owner of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Griffith v. FowlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
- Merritt v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
- Austin v. TildenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842
- Cilley v. CushmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
3Cited by16 opinions
- Flegenheimer v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Howard v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Nutter v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hutchins v. GilchristSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850
- Fitch v. BurkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.