Legal Opinion

State v. Duncan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2003No. C-020016PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} We reverse defendant-appellant Thomas Duncan’s convictions for murder, felony murder, and voluntary manslaughter, due to erroneous jury instructions by a visiting trial judge. The judge mistakenly told the jury that it could find Duncan guilty on both murder counts, in addition to the voluntary-manslaughter count, for causing the death of Raciel “Chubby” Baldwin. The jury returned three guilty verdicts that included a firearm specification for each count. Duncan was sentenced for the murder count. The state concedes that this was an error.

{¶ 2} Because voluntary…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. HurtOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. AmeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. MonroeOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API