Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chicago Transit Authority

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 23, 2015No. 14-2622PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

Robert Smith alleges that the Chicago Transit Authority (“the CTA”) fired him because of his race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The CTA says it fired Smith because he violated its policy against sexual harassment. The district court granted summary judgment for the CTA, concluding that Smith’s case failed under the direct and indirect methods of proof. We affirm.

I. Background

Smith, who is black, began working at the CTA in 1986. In the fall of 2006, he held the position of Transportation Manager and was assigned to the Bus…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Henry WOLF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSS (AMERICA) INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Thomas Hobgood v. Illinois Gaming BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Ryan Lord v. High Voltage Software, IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Silva v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Bagwe v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Riley v. Elkhart Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Ferrill v. Oak Creek-Franklin Joint School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API