Kinney v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
The facts are fully stated by Judge Christian in his opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChristian, J.
The plaintiff in error was indicted in the county court of Augusta county for lewdly associating *and cohabiting with Mahala Miller. He was found guilty and a fine assessed against him to the 'amount of $500. The case was taken up on writ of error to the circuit court, which affirmed the judgment of the county court, and to this latter judgment of the circuit court a writ of error was awarded by one of the judges of this court. The bill of exceptions taken on the trial, in the county court, which brings up before this court the only question we have to determine, is in these words:
“Be it…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Inhabitants of Medway v. Inhabitants of NeedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of StullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Luick v. ArendsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. FennWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Greenhow v. James' Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
- Spradlin v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.