Legal Opinion
Rudolph v. UTStarcom
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 14, 2008No. C 07-04578 SIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. The motion is scheduled for hearing on April 18, 2008. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument, and hereby VACATES the hearing. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND 1
This is a securities class action against UTStarcom and certain of its officers…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robert J. Meyer v. William Britton GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- In Re Dell Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- In re Washington Mutual, Inc. Securities, Derivative & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
- Chamberlain v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust v. Jabil Circuit, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.