Legal Opinion

McIlhenny's Son v. New Iberia Extract of Tobasco Pepper Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 4, 1908No. 447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Hearing on an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents overruling a demurrer to a petition for the cancelation of a registered trademark. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Robb

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents overruling a general demurrer filed by appellant, E. Mellhenny’s Son, to a petition filed by appellee, the New Iberia Extract of Tobasco Pepper Company, Limited, for the cancelation of the word “Tobasco,” which appellant had registered in the Patent Office as a trademark for pepper sauce.

The petition demurred to was filed under the provisions of sec. 13 of the act of February 20, 1905 (33 Stat. at L. 724, chap. 592, TJ. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1907, p. 1008), which reads as- follows: “That whenever any person shall deem himself…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Howard Manufacturing Co. v. Water Lot Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Statham v. New York Life InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Hiatt v. GobltIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Robinson Tobacco Co. v. PhilipsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burmel Handkerchief Corp. v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. Price Vacuum Stores, Inc. v. Admiral Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. The May Department Stores Company v. Kenya CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. The May Department Stores Company v. Kenya CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API