Price Vacuum Stores, Inc. v. Admiral Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, speaking through the Examiner-in-Chief, 97 USPQ 472, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences which granted appellee’s motion for dismissal of appellant’s petition for cancellation of appellee’s registration No. 409,-912 for the trade-mark “Admiral” on the ground that it failed to state facts upon which relief could be granted.
The basic question for our determination is whether appellant has stated a cause of action in its pleadings. However, before answering this question we deem it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Admiral Corp. v. Penco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Alpine Forwarding Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Admiral Corp. v. Penco, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1952
- Old Monk Olive Oil Co. v. Southwestern Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Sharp v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Admiral Corporation v. Price Vacuum StoresDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Land O'Lakes Creameries, Inc. v. Oconomowoc Canning Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1961
- Robert Hall Clothes, Inc. v. Stern-Slegman-Prins CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961