Legal Opinion

Hagen v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1904Published

Motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence.

1Opinion of the CourtScripture, J.

This is a motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence. The motion is founded upon a case and exceptions and the affidavit of the plaintiff and the affidavits of the three new witnesses, Kellar, Heath and Einnérty. The defendant reads in opposition the affidavits of John Garvey and Thomas D. Watkins and the record of conviction of Henry Heath for assault and battery and of Thomas Finnerty for public intoxication.

The action was commenced by service of summons on July 14, 1898; complaint served August 5, 1898; answer served October 13, 1898. Plaintiff and defendant as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Keister v. RankinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Durant v. AbendrothNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kring v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Smith v. MatthewsNew York Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Upington v. KeenanNew York Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API