Legal Opinion
Worsham v. Ehrlich
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 15, 2008No. 1442, September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. EYLER, Judge.
Michael Worsham, appellant, appeals from the grant of various motions to dismiss 1 his amended complaint in favor of Robert Ehrlich (“Ehrlich”), James Reilly (“Reilly”), David Craig (“Craig”), and Rudolph Giuliani (“Giuliani”), appellees, in the Circuit Court for Harford County. The amended complaint alleged violations of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et. seq. (“TCPA”), and the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Maryland Code (2005 Repl.Vol.), § 14-3201 of the Commercial Law Article (“MDTCPA”), and sought damages and injunctive…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Myers v. KayhoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Livesay v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Advance Telecom Process LLC v. DSFederal, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- AGV Sports Group, Inc. v. Protus IP Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Ginwright v. Exeter Finance Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Pasco v. Protus IP Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.