Legal Opinion
Pasco v. Protus IP Solutions, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 23, 2011No. Civil Action No. RDB-08-3388PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.
This is an “unsolicited fax” action brought pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, and the Maryland Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“Maryland TCPA”), Md. Code Ann. Com. Law §§ 14-3201, et seq., by a group of five Plaintiffs: (1) Martin Pasco; (2) Baltimore Podiatry Group, Drs. Scheffler & Sheitel, P.A.; (3) Givens Collision Repair Center, Inc.; (4) Intelligent Devices, Inc.; and (5) Powers & Powers, P.A. (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs contend that they received unsolicited facsimile…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Legg v. Voice Media Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Maryland v. Universal Elections, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- United States v. Dish Network LLCDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2017
- Gross v. MaxDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.