Legal Opinion

Born v. Clark

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 2, 1995No. 1931803PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the disposition of the estate of Kate Stokes Born of Winfield, Alabama, and the specific question presented is to what extent Born's will affected the terms of a trust that she had previously executed. We affirm in part, but we reverse, in part, insofar as the trial judge failed to carry out the intent of the testatrix regarding property not included in the trust estate.

Kate Stokes Born (hereinafter referred to as Born) was married to Terry Born and was the mother of 10 children. On June 7, 1991, she executed and delivered a valid trust, conveying to herself, along with her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Selma Foundry v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Brittain v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Galin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. CurrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Tucker v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Reed v. BD. OF TRUSTEES FOR AL. STATE UNIV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Smith v. Ann MuchiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Matador Holdings v. Hopo Realty Investments, 1091700 (Ala. 8-5-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Kennedy v. Boles Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Regions Bank v. LowreySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API