Legal Opinion
Adam H. Scott v. Innergy Development
District Court, D. Utah
Decided March 31, 2026No. 2:21-cv-00550Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH ADAM H. SCOTT, MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiff, AND ORDER v. Case No. 2:21-cv-550-HCN-DAO INNERGY DEVELOPMENT, Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant. United States District Judge Mr. Scott initiated this action against Innergy Development on September 20, 2021. See Dkt. No. 5. On January 19, 2022, the court ordered Mr. Scott to propose a schedule to the Defendant within 14 days and then do one of three things within 28 days: (1) file a joint Attorney Planning Meeting Report and e-mail chambers a stipulated Proposed Scheduling Order; (2) file…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Olsen v. MapesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Carl E. Bills, in His Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of A. Larue Lamb v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992