Legal Opinion

STATE BY DEPT. OF HIGHWAY v. Feenan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1988No. 87-62PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

This action arose from a condemnation of appellants’ property which adjoins U.S. Highway 40 which is now U.S. Highway 2 near Columbia Falls, Montana. The Feenans appeal from the judgment of the District Court, Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County. Judgment was entered after a seven day trial in which the jury awarded appellants $16,500 for 2.04 acres of land as “damages for property taken.” The jury awarded Feenans nothing for “damages or depreciation in the market value of the remaining property.”

*257We reverse and remand for retrial.

The issue presented for our review in this appeal is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roope v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Aleksich v. Industrial Accident FundMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Newton v. WeilerMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Tacke v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. O'Hare v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Covey v. BrishkaMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. STATE BY DEPT. OF HIGHWAY v. FeenanMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Winkowitsch v. Glacier ElectricMontana Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API