Legal Opinion
Ambrose v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 31, 2022No. 3:21-cv-08133Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Louise Ambrose, No. CV-21-08133-PCT-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment, which are 17 fully briefed. (Docs. 16, 17, 20, 22.) The Court grants summary judgment for Defendant 18 the Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (“ONHIR”) and denies summary 19 judgment for Plaintiff Louise Ambrose. 20 I. Background 21 In 1977, land that was jointly used by the Navajo and Hopi tribes was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Leonardo S. ORTEZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Concepcion Ceguerra Napoleon Ceguerra v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sacora v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Crickon v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.