Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 26, 2000No. 3206Published

1DissentGoolsby, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The law to be charged is determined by the evidence presented at trial.1 The trial judge must charge the jury on a lesser included offense if evidence is present to sustain a conviction for a crime of a lesser degree.2 The judge should *179refuse to charge a lesser included offense only if no evidence exists showing the defendant committed the lesser rather than the greater offense.3

Coleman was indicted for ABIK. ABIK is an unlawful act of a violent nature to the person of another -with malice aforethought, either express or implied.4 ABIK also requires the intent to kill.5…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hopper v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. BurrissSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API