Legal Opinion

State v. Briggs

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 2000No. COA99-365PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Anthony Briggs (Defendant) appeals jury verdicts finding him guilty of extortion and of being an habitual felon.

Prior to trial, Defendant filed a motion to suppress allegedly incriminating statements he made to Renoice Stancil (Stancil), a correction unit manager at Eastern Correction Institute (Eastern), and Milton Nowell, Jr. (Nowell), the assistant superintendent for operations at Eastern. The motion was based on the ground the statements “were made in response to officer interrogation, while in custody, without waiver of Miranda rights.” The State conceded before the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. United States v. James L. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. CockerhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API