Legal Opinion

DiCillo v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2022No. 2020-G-0263Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as DiCillo v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Commrs.,

2022-Ohio-333.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY CHARLES A. DICILLO, CASE NO. 2020-G-0263 Appellee, Civil Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division GEAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Trial Court No. 2019 PC 000504 Appellant. OPINION Decided: February 7, 2022 Judgment: Reversed and entered for appellant Edward A. Proctor, Kim & Associates, 4100 Embassy Parkway, Suite 200, Akron, OH 44333 (For Appellee). James R. Flaiz, Geauga County Prosecutor, and Susan T. Wieland, Assistant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Sackett v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Gundy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Department of Transportation v. Association of American RailroadsSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API