State v. Artus
Supreme Court of Louisiana
' Appeal from Twenty-Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard; Robert Hingle, Judge. J. M. Artus was convicted of fraud, and appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
MONROE, J.
The defendant in this case, having been prosecuted, under section 2 of Act No. 94, p. 138, of 1896, for buying goods on credit, and selling, or otherwise disposing of them out of the usual course of business, with intent to cheat and defraud the vendor, and having been convicted by the judge, agreeably to article 116 of the Constitution, has appealed from a sentence of fine and imprisonment imposed for each of two offenses. The appeal was returnable on the first Monday, but the time was extended to the third Monday, of November, 1902. Upon December 20th…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. GunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- State v. HarkisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thorpe v. Pennock Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. StockettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- State v. ChretienSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.