Legal Opinion

State v. Chretien

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 30, 1936No. 33756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

The defendants, James Chretien and Berneta Soileau, were jointly tried and convicted on a charge of concubinage, and were sentenced to the penitentiary.

Upon overruling a motion for new trial, defendants announced through their counsel that they were ready for sentence. Sentence was imposed, and the judgments were read and signed. Defendants immediately moved for an appeal to this court, which was granted.

The motion for new trial was made, first, on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence; and, second, on the ground that the bills of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. State v. HainesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  3. State v. PoreeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. State v. SeileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API