Legal Opinion

Rohr v. Gatch

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided April 15, 1918Published

1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.

This case is submitted upon a motion for new trial. At th$ close of plaintiff’s evidence and upon renewal when all the evidence was offered, a motion was made by the defendant executor, to enter judgment in his favor and against the plaintiff. The motion called in question the validity of a contract made by the beneficiaries under the will, and challenged the right of plaintiff to maintain the action because of the ierms and conditions of the contract.

This motion was overruled, the case was tried and the jury returned a verdict holding the will of Amos T. Rohr not to be *66Iiis last will and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ruth v. KroneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  2. Reichard v. IzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  3. Ridenbaugh v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Schoonmaker v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Waller's Adm'x v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API