Legal Opinion

United States v. Nirvana Ward Zuideveld and Jack Zuideveld

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1963No. 13772_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by Jack Zuideveld and Nirvana Zuideveld, his wife,1 from a judgment of conviction for conspiracy to use the United States mails for the transmission of obscene materials in violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 1461.2

In a single count indictment, appellants and thirty-seven other individuals were charged with the alleged conspiracy. Forty-two other individuals were named *875as non-defendant coconspirators. The indictment sets oat sixty-six overt acts charged to effect the objects of said conspiracy. The conspiracy was alleged to have commenced on or about March…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Samuel G. Redwine, Clifford G. Redwine, and Chester Strong, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Harry P. Hutul, Robert Sacks, Herbert Basan, Nancy Mitchell, and Vito LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Ronald Woodard and Ranier SeeligCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  5. Lloyd Nelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API