Legal Opinion
United States v. Ronald Woodard and Ranier Seelig
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 4, 1967No. 15567_1PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
Ronald Woodard and Ranier Seelig appeal from their convictions of disorderly conduct pursuant to the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 7 and 13,1 *139and the Illinois disorderly conduct statute, Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, § 26-1 (a) (1). The district court suspended the imposition of fines against both defendants and placed them on probation for a period of nine months. The defendants challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the constitutionality of the disorderly conduct statute, and allege several trial errors.
The essential facts follow. On May 25, 1965, the House…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- The PEOPLE v. RabyIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Andy Thayer v. Ralph ChiczewskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Betty Lester v. City of Chicago, Officer Daniel Leahy, Officer Ernest Cain, and Sergeant John McNultyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- John S. Terket v. Harold LundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Edith Milestone v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.