Legal Opinion

Chrysler Credit Corp. v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 1993No. 92-1579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICKLE, Judge.

Hill-Kelly Leasing, Inc. (“H-K Leasing” or “Appellant”), the sole remaining appellant, challenges the trial court’s summary final judgment in favor of Appellee United Services Automobile Association (“U.S.A.A.” or “Carrier”). We affirm.

In March 1989, Bruce Hagen owned two vehicles insured by U.S.A.A. On March 28, 1989, Hagen entered into a rental agreement with H-K Leasing to lease a Dodge automobile for travel to New Orleans because his own vehicle was not driveable at the time. While operating the rental car in Mississippi on April 4, 1989, Hagen was involved in a collision…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reid v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Demshar v. AAACon Auto Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Fla. Farm Bureau Ins. v. Government Emp. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. Fitzgibbon v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Skroh v. Travelers Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whirlpool Corp. v. ZiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Motzenbecker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Van GesselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API